Let me get this straight. CBs runs a story saying that President Bush received favorable treatment when he was in the gaurd. That Bush disobeyed orders to report for a physical. Then they proceed to back up their story with some memos that was supposed to be written and signed by Bush's commanding officer who is now deceased.
CBS fails to mention that just 3 months prior to the time these "memos" were written, the same commanding officer had written very good reviews about the then Lt. Bush. Then it was discovered that the memos CBS based their story on were forgeries. CBS brings the Late Col Killian's secretary who also confirms that the documents are forgeries. She howevers claims that the content of these forged memos were the the thoughts of her late boss (who is no longer alive to defend himself). However, late Col. Killian's widow and son (who also served in the Air National Guard) claim Col. Killian did not keep personal memos and never worte anything like that. The son also claims that his father had a favorable opinion of the then Lt. Bush.
CBS is trying to get us to buy the story and disregard the forged documents. They are insisting the story is true but the documents are forgeries. Unbelievable!
What Dan Rather fails to report is that the Late Col Killian's secretary is a Kerry supporter and Bush hater. He also wants us to ignore the fact his whole story is based on forged documents. We are supposed to believe the contents of these forged memos reflected the thoughts of Col Killian at that time.
My question is, do these memos really reflect the thoughts of the Late Col. Killian or Dan Rahter's thoguhts?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home